{"id":900,"date":"2022-09-26T18:38:05","date_gmt":"2022-09-26T16:38:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/projects.unifr.ch\/aesthetics-critique\/?p=900"},"modified":"2022-11-22T11:11:43","modified_gmt":"2022-11-22T10:11:43","slug":"after_nature","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/projects.unifr.ch\/aesthetics-critique\/2022\/09\/26\/after_nature\/","title":{"rendered":"Seminar: Aesthetics & Critique V – After Nature \/ (D’)apr\u00e8s Nature \/ Nach der Natur"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Saturday 26 November – Kunsthalle FriArt – Petites Rames, 22 – 1700 Fribourg<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

For centuries, artists have been keen to paint from nature. What remains of this aesthetic project in a world where nature is revealed as already fully \u201canthropized\u201d? What is left of nature, when it has lost the status of the Great Outdoors? Faced with climate emergency, other politics – but also: aesthetics – of nature become urgent. How to conceive a nature that is no longer located beyond us, but that permeates us? How to think, in return, a nature already marked by recursive processes, in short: by technique ? Perhaps nature after nature never was but that: a nature that discovers itself as having always been second nature. A nature as art.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Pendant des si\u00e8cles, les artistes se sont employ\u00e9s \u00e0 peindre d\u2019apr\u00e8s nature. Que reste-t-il de ce projet esth\u00e9tique dans un monde o\u00f9 la nature se r\u00e9v\u00e8le comme \u00e9tant d\u00e9j\u00e0 int\u00e9gralement \u00ab anthropis\u00e9e \u00bb? Que reste-t-il de la nature, lorsque celle-ci a perdu le statut de Grand Dehors ? Face \u00e0 l\u2019urgence climatique, d\u2019autres politiques \u2013 mais aussi : esth\u00e9tiques \u2013 de la nature sont n\u00e9cessaires. Comment concevoir une nature qui n\u2019est plus situ\u00e9e au-del\u00e0 de nous, mais qui nous traverse ? Comment penser, en retour, une nature d\u00e9j\u00e0 travers\u00e9e par la r\u00e9cursivit\u00e9, bref : par la technique ? Car la nature apr\u00e8s la nature n\u2019est peut-\u00eatre rien d\u2019autre que cela : une nature qui se d\u00e9couvre comme ayant toujours \u00e9t\u00e9 nature seconde. Une nature en tant qu\u2019art. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Seit Jahrhunderten malen K\u00fcnstler \u201enach der Natur\u201c. Was bleibt von diesem \u00e4sthetischen Projekt in einer Welt, in der sich die Natur als bereits vollst\u00e4ndig \u201eanthropisiert\u201c erweist? Was bleibt von der Natur \u00fcbrig, wenn sie nicht l\u00e4nger als das \u201eGro\u00dfe Au\u00dfen\u201d gelten kann? Angesichts des Klimanotstands wird eine andere Politik der Natur dringlich, sowie eine andere \u00c4sthetik. Wie l\u00e4sst sich Natur denken, die nicht mehr jenseits von uns liegt, sondern uns durchwirkt? Wie vermag Natur umgekehrt jedoch auch als etwas anerkannt werden, dass immer schon durch Rekursivit\u00e4t, kurzum: durch Technik, gepr\u00e4gt ist? Natur nach der Natur bedeutet vielleicht nichts anderes als das: Natur entdeckt sich selbst als jene zweite Natur, die sie immer schon war. Als eine Natur der Kunst. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Invited speakers: <\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Sabeth Buchmann<\/strong> (Universit\u00e4t Wien) <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Howard Caygill <\/strong>(Kingston University London)  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Toni Hildebrandt <\/strong>(Universit\u00e4t Bern)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Federico Luisetti <\/strong>(Universit\u00e4t St. Gallen)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Pietro Montani <\/strong>(Sapienza Roma) <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Pauline Nadrigny<\/strong> (Universit\u00e9 Paris I)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Info and registration<\/strong>: alessandro.decesaris@unifr.ch<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Saturday 26 November – Kunsthalle FriArt – Petites Rames, 22 – 1700 Fribourg For centuries, artists have been keen to paint from nature. What remains of this aesthetic project in a world where nature is revealed as already fully \u201canthropized\u201d? What is left of nature, when it has lost the status of the Great Outdoors? … Read moreSeminar: Aesthetics & Critique V – After Nature \/ (D’)apr\u00e8s Nature \/ Nach der Natur<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":912,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,5,9,1,11],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/projects.unifr.ch\/aesthetics-critique\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/900"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/projects.unifr.ch\/aesthetics-critique\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/projects.unifr.ch\/aesthetics-critique\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/projects.unifr.ch\/aesthetics-critique\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/projects.unifr.ch\/aesthetics-critique\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=900"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/projects.unifr.ch\/aesthetics-critique\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/900\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":915,"href":"https:\/\/projects.unifr.ch\/aesthetics-critique\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/900\/revisions\/915"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/projects.unifr.ch\/aesthetics-critique\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/912"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/projects.unifr.ch\/aesthetics-critique\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=900"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/projects.unifr.ch\/aesthetics-critique\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=900"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/projects.unifr.ch\/aesthetics-critique\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=900"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}